While it is safe to assume that literary scholars agree as to the inalienable value of literature, problems arise when we try to quantify or otherwise make explicit its worth. Considering the value of literature is difficult primarily because this ostensibly requires the quantification of an aesthetic form that by its very nature thwarts measurement. This does not mean that literature is an ineffable phenomenon. On the contrary, its ability to engage with the vast spectrum of human experience suggests that it is very much of the intelligible world. However, questions regarding its value linger in an age where pragmatic concerns can supersede the more subtle social ameliorations of literary forms – in particular, when economic outcomes are embraced over the intangible merits of literature and ideas.1
Hanna Meretoja and Pirjo Lyytikäinen argue that ‘values have been an integral part of literary debate ever since the ancient quarrel between Plato…